I wrote my first book when I was 7 years old. I even illustrated it. It was a story about Gus, the lost arrow, that was eventually found. Although an outlandish idea, my love for writing and communicating with words has been a life-long passion.
Writing about writing may be a futile effort–one should just write, right? Perhaps, however, some insights may be helpful to others.
- Writing is done in different ways for various purposes and aimed at diverse audiences. I enjoyed my academic writing and felt challenged to make writing factual and at the same time, understandable. The first time I was told my academic writing was accessible, I did not think it was a compliment. I thought it meant that I did not sound intellectual enough. Now I believe communicating clearly is paramount. I am comfortable with professional approaches that are also personal in nature. Writing a blog for general audiences is a new challenge to explore.
- Anais Nin said, “We write to taste life twice: in the moment and in retrospect.” As I get older and reflect on life, I am aware of events that have given it meaning. Writing allows me to ponder the people, animals, places, and ideas that have nurtured my soul.
- Keeping a journal every day gets ideas down without attached judgment. Journaling has been a part of life since I first read The Diary of Anne Frank as an elementary student. Writing personal thoughts is therapeutic and gives an outlet for ideas. I have not gone back to read 95% of my journals but I know where to go if I want to taste life twice.
- Recent political events have punctuated the idea that words have consequences. Writers use words and each word has meaning. I learned from my colleague, Dan Dustin, in graduate school almost 45 years ago. I did not understand how he could ponder over the right word choice for hours. Now I understand how important the precise word is in expressing ideas.
- Another guideline I learned years ago in my creative non-fiction writing group was “show them, don’t just tell them.” I drove my students crazy in editing their work because I did not allow hyperbolic words in their papers such as “very.” In the writing, show me why I should interpret something as “very.”
- In launching this blog and stepping out of academic writing, I have lacked confidence. I take heart in what Margaret Atwood said, “If I waited for perfection… I would never write a word.” My work isn’t perfect, but I do my best.
- Being an avid and reflective reader influences how I write. I love reading and noting how other authors have used words to make stories that resonate with me. I pay attention and learn from the way words are used and how sentences are composed. I focus on crafting my voice in similar ways.
- Writing means re-writing. It requires discipline. I used to tell my students that they should never consider a manuscript/paper done until it had been re-written at least a half dozen times. My friend, Sherryl Kleiman, talked about “spew” drafts as the first round–just get the ideas out there. Then edit over and over. The final product may look different from the spew and should organize those idea kernels. Economy and the right words are the focus of re-writing.
- The challenge with writing is making the familiar interesting and the unusual familiar for readers. I greatly admire Mae Sarton. She wrote about everyday things in her life and made them exceptional. Her accounts of her home and her life with her plants and cats resonated with me. I hope that the ideas I find interesting will also provide reflection for some readers.
- Finally, I am learning that writing regularly is the best way to grow and get better at writing. Writing about ideas, no matter how weird, allows me to explore, relive, and reflect on this beautiful and crazy world. Writing sustains my wandering and wondering mind.
Hi Karla,
Nice comments about the writing process. I wonder what you think about the role of reading in support of writing? How far and wide, for example. Eric Blehm, my former student at SDSU who has gone on to become a highly successful writer commercially, credits Stephen King’s book “On Writing” as being a good source to learn more about the craft. I will also be curious as times goes on about how satisfying you find new kinds of writing when compared to academic writing. Do they, for example, service entirely different masters?
Dan
Thanks for your comments, Dan. I do think that writing books are helpful. I have a number of them that I have studied over the years. I guess now I mainly rely on my experience rather than what others suggest, although I still gain nuggets from them. I do think the kind of writing I am doing now serves a different audience. I like that but I think one of the things that kept, and now keeps, me going was that some people found the writing interesting and useful. I really enjoyed the academic writing and this new way is quite scary for me, but I find it is good for where I am in my life right now. I wish we could have this conversation in person, but hopefully that will be possible in the not too distant future. You have been a great inspiration to me as a writer and I have modeled some of my thinking from you, but I also recognize that I have a different style that I am trying to develop.
I like this reflection of your take on your writing. I remember wondering how anyone could possibly get up at 5 am and with a cup of black coffee, sit down and write. I never could see how your brain could handle the audacious task of putting thoughts down and/or re-thinking them like you did…. I saw first hand how the spew version turned into thoughtful articles that often ended up being these important influential pieces appreciated by many! Most of us can only wish and hope for that kind of outcome 🙂
Thanks for your kind remarks, Deb. I didn’t write in the blog about what I learned from you regarding “thinking before your write” as opposed to my “writing to think.” They are all different styles that work different for different people. I am glad you are appreciating my new ways of writing!